© 2003-2006 David Moles
Chrononautic Log |
|
May 2006
»
|
April 28, 2006There must be an answer to this question7:42 AM, Friday, April 28, 2006Why does a one-way flight from Chicago to Zurich cost fifty percent more than a round trip? (Not fifty percent more than half a round trip. Fifty percent more than a whole round trip.) I mean, it’s not like I’m surprised by this, but seriously, what is up with it? I need an answer that does not assume that airlines are crazy, and does not assume that customers are too stupid to realize they could buy a round trip and not use the second half.
|
Serial or parallel?1:35 AM, Friday, April 28, 2006Amazon is identifying Vernor Vinge’s
|
April 27, 2006Answers to odd numbered questions #22:26 AM, Thursday, April 27, 2006The Chief looks up at him and suddenly reaches his hands for Willard’s throat, trying to pull Willard down on top of the spearhead, trying to skewer him, and pull him along with him to death. (That’s as far as I go, though, Mr. H. Infecting other people’s comment sections with memes is already giving them a vector they don’t need.)
|
April 26, 2006Bingo11:30 PM, Wednesday, April 26, 2006Mary Anne on the Kaavya Viswanathan thing: What bothers me the most about the whole thing is not what Kaavya did or didn't consciously do. It’s that if she had been paid $500 for the book, instead of $500,000, most of the people ranting about it clearly wouldn't care. Exactly.
|
Collectible3:17 AM, Wednesday, April 26, 2006So, a while back a friend of mine wanted to know if there was a way he could get ahold of my stuff without having to try to track down these out-of-print zines and whatnot, and I had some fun putting together a little “Unauthorized Complete Works” for him in InDesign. It came to a bit over 60,000 words; throw in the Irrational Histories (memo to self: write some more of those at some point) and maybe a hitherto-unpublished novelette or two, and that’s enough for a book. But it occurred to me as I was doing it that just because I could put together enough words for a book didn’t mean that it would be a good idea to actually do that. I think about the kind of things I was thinking about when Susan and I were arranging the Twenty Epics TOC — pace, weight, ambience — and it just doesn't feel like there’s enough variety yet in what I’ve written. Then there was this Crooked Timber piece about Wikipedia, prejudice against, one example of which was an aside in John Clute’s overall, highly positive review of Dora Goss’ In the Forest of Forgetting. (I quote slightly more of it than CT did, because I’m more interested in what Clute has to say about fiction than it what he has to say about Wikipedia.) The first problem [that we need to address “before we can return to praise”] is not Goss’ alone. It is something that may derive from the tendency of mutants to emit blog gas, for the net culture they live in has no internal or external censors, no captaining of the unsorted untested wikipedian utterances of the gawping soul, no place for the buck to stop. So mutants tend to publish too much. Now, whether Clute’s right or not (and I think there is an argument to be made that not all of us are at our best in the single-author collection mode, and also that selecting the best from a larger body of work may have advantages over including the entirety of a smaller body of work, whether or not one wants, like Clute, to blame ‘the net culture’), all this got me thinking: what makes a good single-author collection? Clearly it helps to be brilliant. But if you look at, say, Stranger Things Happen, it’s not just that Kelly’s written a bunch of really excellent stories; she also does a lot of different, interesting things with voice and tone, and I think that makes a difference. It doesn’t help, in trying to figure this out, that I’m not really a fan of short fiction, as a form, and I haven’t read hardly any of the recent collections that everyone says are so brilliant. But I used to read a lot of them, back in the dizzay (I think I read everything Larry Niven published in the 1970s), and there have been a few over the years that have made the list of favorite books (Stranger Things Happen, Globalhead, Burning Chrome come straight to mind) as well as a few that I keep around because enough of the stories in them are absolutely indispensible (generally retrospectives, like The Best Short Stories of JG Ballard or The Collected Stories of Greg Bear). If you’re only going to read one story at a time, then mere brilliance is enough. But what does it take to make a collection that you can read cover to cover?
|
Fanfic12:54 AM, Wednesday, April 26, 2006Something that occurred to me during the latest fanfic kerfluffle: All novels written for love are fanfic. The ones we call original are fanfic for the unrealized universe of works that exist only in the writer’s head. What’s important to remember is that, as the writer, you are those works’ only fan, and it’s the non-fans, the readers of your actual novel, that your work needs to appeal to.
|
Abraham Lincoln rocks12:29 AM, Wednesday, April 26, 2006Due to the fact that Lincoln was the one who had been challenged to the duel, tradition gave him the privilege of choosing the time and location of the duel, as well as the weapons that were to be used. Being a man of humor and wit, and having no desire to kill Shields, or allow himself to be killed; Lincoln put together the most ridiculous set of circumstances that he could think of regarding the logistics of the upcoming duel. Lincoln stated that the duel would be held on an island in the river near the city of Alton, IL. Some historians believe that it was “Sunflower Island”, while others believe it was “Bloody Island”. Bloody Island had long been a popular dueling spot because it was in the middle of the river and was claimed by Missouri where dueling was still legal. Either island would have allowed them to escape any legal implications. Lincoln stated that the weapons he wished to use would be “Cavalry Broadswords of the largest size”. He figured that he could easily disarm Shields using the swords, whereas pistols would most likely lead to one of their deaths, if not both. He also added that he wanted the duel to be carried out in a pit 10 feet wide by 12 feet deep with a large wooden plank dividing the square in which no man was allowed to step foot over. These “conditions” were designed not only to be ridiculous; but also to give Lincoln, who at 6’4” had longer legs and arms and towered over the much smaller Shields, a decided advantage. Lincoln hoped that these unorthodox conditions that gave him an almost unbeatable advantage would persuade Shields to withdraw the challenge and settle things in a more gentlemanly fashion. Shields, however, was extremely stubborn and refused to yield despite the conditions that Lincoln had requested. He agreed to Lincoln’s conditions and no other negotiations were made. Much to Lincoln’s dismay, the two headed to the appointed island early in the morning on September 22 and prepared to do battle in their “Saber Duel”. . . . At the last minute, Lincoln demonstrated his obvious physical advantage by hacking away at some of the branches of a nearby willow tree. The branches were high off the ground and Shields could not hope to reach them; while Lincoln, with his long arms holding a long broadsword, could reach them with ease. This final display was enough to drive home the precarious situation that he was now in, and Shields agreed to settle their differences in a more peaceful way. . . . After the “duel”, both groups had the appropriate “after parties” and reflected on the fact they both could have met their ends because of a few sarcastic comments and hurt feelings. The two were civil with each other after this unfortunate incident and remained friends and political allies for the rest of their careers. Lincoln was extremely embarrassed about the whole incident and refused to talk about it very often. Lincoln began to be more careful about what he wrote in letters and other papers, even those he wrote to his closest and most intimate friends. Never again did he so harshly use another person to try to further his political career. (Via Making Light.)
|
April 23, 2006Let’s head down to Tuscany and grab some lunch5:33 AM, Sunday, April 23, 2006So
|
| Comments (8) |
April 20, 2006TWENTY EPICS status update5:14 AM, Thursday, April 20, 2006I’ve told the authors, but some of the rest of you are probably curious, too. So here’s an excerpt from the letter I sent them: Some of you may have heard the rumor that Wheatland Press, our publishing partner for Twenty Epics, has run into financial trouble and had to cut back on pretty much all their projects other than the Polyphony anthology series. This rumor is true. Unfortunately there was an email mixup, and Susan and I didn’t hear about this as soon as Wheatland intended to tell us about it, so we’ve had to scramble a bit to make other arrangements. After talking to a couple of other possible partners, we’ve decided that the simplest option, and the one that offers the best chance of still meeting our original goal of having the book out by the end of May, is just to publish it ourselves, directly. This shouldn’t have any noticeable effect on the book's availability or quality. The main downside is that the book manufacturing service we’ve decided to go with (Lulu) doesn't offer a full range of print sizes, and we’ve had to reformat the book for a 6"x9" size rather than the 5.5"x8.5" it was originally designed for — this has eaten up some valuable time . . . Plus there’s been the whole moving-to-Switzerland thing. :) So, to make a long story short, that’s done now, and while the end-of-May schedule is a little tight, we still ought to be able to make it. We’ve got a manuscript, and we’ve got a cover painting (pix soon). So we ought at least to have advance reader copies available at WisCon. An honest-to-goodness first edition if I can manage it, but that at the very least. If anyone has a really strong desire to proofread, now would be a good time to raise your hand. :)
|
Thought for the day1:58 AM, Thursday, April 20, 2006Shoot for the stars, and if you hit the moon, well, shit, you’re on the fucking moon. — Kameron Hurley
|
Apartment pix1:38 AM, Thursday, April 20, 2006I tried to Flickrize these, but I ran out of bandwidth, so you’ll have to settle for the low-res versions for now. First, the neighborhood. So far the only notable landmark I’ve discovered is this place . . . |
| Comments (7) |
April 17, 2006Even slaves dance4:17 AM, Monday, April 17, 2006Or, Kameron Hurley is a genius. I’ve been trying to articulate this thought myself for quite some time: I don’t believe people live without friendship, without laughter, without any joy in their lives. Women who’ve had cliterodectimies do, in fact, still have a sense of humor and take joy (or not) in their children (maybe they take joy in flowers instead. Or making pottery. Or whatever). Even slaves dance. Abused women have been known to sing. It’s important to remember that. And not just when you’re reading Touched by Venom.
|
City of Memory4:07 AM, Monday, April 17, 2006The first night I stayed in my new place, I fell asleep trying to remember a book that was never written. I’d lived with that book once, waking and sleeping, for the better part of four years; between my eighteenth birthday and my twentieth wrote nearly thirty thousand words of it. Then some time later a different idea took hold of my imagination, and for more than a decade that was, more or less, that. I don’t know what brought that unwritten book to mind. Some unlikely combination of sounds, scents, flavors; rain-wet spring air through the open window, the feel of a thin foam mattress on a hard floor. Probably I’ll never know. But: ten computers and several versions of Word later, I still have the files. So last night I pulled them up, curious what this Moles kid might have written that could have made such an impression on me. Was there anything more than potential there? Was the book any good? Was he any good? Well, he was no Meghan McCarron. He didn’t have much sense of character—his protagonist was a middle-class Everyman (Everyboy, really); his other characters could mostly be summed up in a word or two: the Girl, the Antihero, the Rival, the Father Figure, the Other Girl. His dialogue was occasionally good, occasionally over the top, often banal. His plots took a few twists and turns, but they were complications, not reversals. He had trouble with pacing, trouble figuring out which parts of a scene were unnecessary, where exposition was needed and where it could be dispensed with. But he also had a flair for description, when there was an image worth describing; the beginnings of an individual style, built on a rhythm of short phrases and simple adjectives. He had an ear for made-up languages and specialized vocabularies. His invented mythology took the 80s’ medieval preoccupations and complicated them with 90s concerns like modernization, ethnic cleansing, religious apocalypse, cutting up and reassembling familiar tropes in ways that wouldn’t be completely foreign to readers of Steph Swainston or Jeff VanderMeer. His fight scenes weren’t half bad. If I ran into him in a workshop, what would I say? You’ve got potential, kid—certainly. I could give him some advice on where to cut, how to decide which scenes to write and which to skip over. I could suggest that he dispense with some of the more florid ‘legends’ and ‘ancient texts’. I could point him to some useful reference books. The deeper flaws, though—mainly they’re just the natural consequence of being a well-traveled but sheltered and introverted nineteen, having your talent outstrip your experience, knowing more about history and mythology than about how the world works and how people think and behave. I look back and I think my instinct—that if I’d finished that book when I was twenty, I could have sold it, but that it’s just as well that I didn’t—is the right one. The better part of a decade passed between when I stopped working on it and when I finished and sold my first short story, and I don’t think any of those years were wasted. On the other hand, there are things about that Moles kid’s writing that I miss: the broad canvas, the obsessive worldbuilding, the reaching after high tragedy. The lack of pretension, and the un-self-consciousness of his imagination. I have to put that unfinished book down again, now; I’ve got other things to do. But maybe when those things are done I’ll pick it up again. It would be a gift, of sorts; an homage, even. There are a handful of writers without whose influence I couldn’t have become the writer I am today, and that kid is one of them.
|
Apartment!4:03 AM, Monday, April 17, 2006So, the reason that I haven’t been posting much about the whole Swiss thing, the last two or three weeks, is that I’ve been increasingly stressed out over still being stuck in a company-rented studio after more than a month—not that there’s anything wrong with it, but last weekend I calculated that (figuring from when I left Seattle), I’d been on the road, living out of a suitcase, for seventy days. I’m not sure whether that’s a record for me or not—the time, when I was fourteen, between when my family left San Diego and when we found a house in Tokyo must have been almost as long, if not longer—but the inability to completely unpack or completely relax, the slight but undeniable conditionality of any privacy I might have, was really starting to get to me. I had a couple of weekends here and there where I decided I wasn’t really up for anything but sitting on the couch playing video games, and at least one Sunday where I never left the studio or even got out of my bathrobe, but it’s only in the last week or two that the idea I should have moved to New York or LA or Tokyo has (however briefly) crossed my mind, or that I had to remind myself that Switzerland Is Not The Enemy. (It’s nothing, really; not even as bad as I expected it to be before I came over. You should have seen what I thought of Tokyo that first year. But I destroyed those notebooks, so you can’t.) But! All that’s over now. (And just in time, since someone else was expecting to move into the company studio Sunday.) I have an apartment.
|
| Comments (8) |
April 10, 2006Feuer in Fort Griffin12:21 AM, Monday, April 10, 2006Wondering where all the Western pulps went? Switzerland. Via Germany.
|
| Comments (3) |
April 6, 2006Meaning and nonsense8:07 AM, Thursday, April 6, 2006Shortly afterwards the conversation turned upon Hegel, and I maintained that his writings were mostly nonsense; or, at any rate, that there were many passages in them where the author wrote the words, and it was left to the reader to find a meaning for them. — Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy
|
The future of retail1:58 AM, Thursday, April 6, 2006If Futurama, Dune and Battlestar Galactica had a quick screw somewhere in the aisles of your local Wal-Mart, their mutant love child might be something like John Aegard and Kat Ayer’s new comic, Greeter. The complete Issue 0, “In Vitro Mobilization,” is on line at Greeter Comics. Johnzo’s a crazy-talented writer and Kat Ayer’s a damn good artist; I can’t wait for Issue 1.
|