© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  Dr. Groppi’s exam
  Main  
Keeping busy  »

film

Belated Pirates mini-review

3 o'clock, July 28, 2006

Yes, they finally finished putting the French and German subtitles on it this week. So:

  1. Biggest disappointment: In Curse of the Black Pearl, Jack Sparrow was a fascinating character. In Dead Man’s Chest, Jack Sparrow is a dull and cowardly clown.
  2. Most pleasant surprise: Return of [ex-]Commodore Norrington. (Jack Davenport would make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.)
  3. Second most pleasant surprise: Orlando Bloom seems to be developing some gravitas.
  4. Most pleasant non-surprise: Keira Knightley in drag, with a rapier in one hand and a cutlass in the other.
  5. Second most pleasant non-surprise: Stellan Skarsgård as William Turner Sr.
  6. Oddest odd thing: Distinct downplaying of piratey goodness in favor of generic action sequences, despite appearance of word Pirates in film title.
  7. Most irritating odd thing: Widely reviled cannibal islander sequence could have been completely excised from movie with no negative consequences for plot, and possible positive consequences for pacing.
  8. Second most irritating odd thing: Destruction of second cage conveniently removing all non-white crewmembers.
  9. Biggest relief: Having read indifferent reviews before seeing movie, setting expectations appropriately.
  10. Biggest fear: Pirates 3 :: Pirates 2 as Return of the Jedi :: Empire Strikes back.
  11. Why I would have been willing to see Pirates 3 immediately anyway: See 2 through 5.

Comments

How do the subtitles work? Do they have both languages up there at the same time, or do you have to pick which version you want to see, i.e., French subtitles in Theater 1, German in Theater 2?

—— Jon, 5:03 AM, Friday, July 28, 2006

Huh. Rather at odds with you on points 1 and 3. I'm still not convinced Orlando Bloom was in the movie. And while Jack wasn't given as much to do in the sequel, I loved him and there's still plenty going on there that hasn't been explained.

Other than that, pretty much yeah. My theory is that the makers fell in love with the pretty-but-pointless Elizabeth-in-the-rain opening and ended up mucking up most of the opening act. I kept thinking about the opening to the first movie, with Jack stepping off the mast of his sinking ship and immediately getting into trouble. This one didn't have that, and it took a while to recover.

—— Dave Schwartz, 10:31 AM, Friday, July 28, 2006

The thing I found most annoying about the movie was their attempt to create a love triangle. The whole Elizabeth/Jack rum-drinking thing in the first movie was played -perfectly- because they LEFT IT ALONE afterwards.

It's not that I always prefer the underlying sexual tension to the overt romantic drama, it's that there's nothing -plausible- about Elizabeth actually trying to have a -relationship- with Jack Sparrow. I mean, seriously. We know it, she must know it, so leave it be. Stupidness.

—— Susan, 10:42 AM, Friday, July 28, 2006

re: love triangle.

Well yea - we know it, she knows it, but Orlando is supposed to not know it, because he's young and not terribly confident.

But I could have used some more set up of Orlando being young and not terribly confident, something beyond his long, puppy-dog looks on camera (or merely relying on the audience's memory of him in the first movie).

re: Bloom and acting

I honestly didn't believe Bloom could play an actual person - as opposed to a pretty plastic person, or an elf - until I saw Elizabeth Town.

In any case, everybody got ripped off as far as character goes cause they fell in love with the long action sequences. Cut some of those sequences and give your characters some time to emote as opposed to just act, and yea, could have been brilliant instead of just fun.

I think the opening could have worked very well - in a different movie - but yes, the tone was totally wrong for the rest of the film. I still love the scene, mind you, I was just very aware of how out of place it was.

—— Kameron Hurley, 11:00 AM, Friday, July 28, 2006