© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  More on realiness
  Main  
Take that, Swisscom!  »

art

Best Writing Advice Ever (Except Meghan’s)

3 o'clock, June 3, 2006

Kelly Link says what I’ve been trying to say for a year or two now, only much better, ’cause she is, after all, Kelly Link.

The only thing you have to offer an editor, and readers, is you. Your voice. Stories and characters and narrative twists that only you are strange enough to want to write. Take risks. Some of you are in critique circles that have been going for quite some time. You know each other well enough to have built trust. And it takes trust to show a workshop the kind of ambitious work I'd like to see. Take chances. Write stories whose characters and the endings surprise even you.

All y’all (and y’all know who all y’all are), listen up!

(Courtesy of Charles Coleman Finlay, via Greg.)


Update: It occurs to me that maybe next time I join a writing group I maybe should think less about being a nice guy and more about getting everyone in the group to do better work. Be warned.

Comments

"It occurs to me that maybe next time I join a writing group I maybe should think less about being a nice guy and more about getting everyone in the group to do better work."

This is not an either/or situation. If you want a great writing group, you gotta do both. (Yes, you're being quick and glib, but this is one of those notions that sounds good when you're feeling grumpy, but it just leads to posturing instead of art.)

—— will shetterly, 8:38 AM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

I think Kelly encourages people to do better work while remaining nice.

—— Ted, 11:05 AM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

Point well taken.

—— David Moles, 11:06 AM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

David's always managed to be nice to me while pointing out deep flaws in my stories.

But maybe he's been holding back! :-o

—— Greg van Eekhout, 11:15 AM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

On the other hand, I wonder if a workshop's goal ought not to be helping a writer be the best, most interesting writer s/he can be, but rather helping a writer be the kind of writer s/he wants to be. If a writer's goal is to craft things that are conventional, unthreatening, even formulaic, then isn't it the workshop's job to help that writer achieve those goals?

—— Greg van Eekhout, 11:24 AM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

Okay, but I don't want to workshop with those people.

—— David Moles, 12:55 PM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

Sorry, what I meant was something more like : "Speaking as Your Reader, you are not allowed to be formulaic, at least not grossly so, because contrary to popular publishing beliefs, I don't actually want to read a whole lot more of precisely the same old thing."

For the record, the workshop process seems to be at best tangential to the discussion; the original comment seems more pointedly directed at the writers who are deciding what to write next.

—— Your Reader, 11:25 PM, Saturday, June 3, 2006

Well, workshops are where most of us see it in other people. And there's nothing to say a formulaic first draft can't turn into something more interesting in the rewrite process, either.

—— David Moles, 2:20 AM, Sunday, June 4, 2006

Also, let me clarify: I'm happy to workshop with somebody who wants to write something commercial, conventional. Somebody who wants to write mass-market bubblegum. There's nothing wrong with bubblegum.

As long as it aspires to be the best bubblegum ever.

(And if it has a shockingly delicious liquid center, so much the better.)

—— David Moles, 2:42 AM, Sunday, June 4, 2006

Wait, what was Meghan's again?

—— Karen, 2:14 PM, Sunday, June 4, 2006

“Jesus Christ, I am so fucking hung over.”

—— David Moles, 2:09 AM, Monday, June 5, 2006