© 2003-2006 David Moles
Chrononautic Log |
|
Main |
|
I got yer authorial intention right here, or: Wordsworth on the beach9 o'clock, July 25, 2005Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels say: “The meaning of a text is simply identical to the author’s intended meaning.” John Holbo says:
An ashtray did my spirit seal; When someone else uses a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less. |
Comments |
|
He does seem to have undermined his argument by prefacing it with that example, in spite of his attempts to mitigate that farther down. The fact remains that the poem was written by Holbo, with his wife and Wordsworth as witting and unwitting accomplices, and with the sole intent of proving he's a wiseacre. What else do you need to know? It's therefore quite different from the fictitious-anthropic words-in-sand and words-on-rock examples. But hey, the mad lib's broken! I just tried to rhyme "course" with "cheese." |
|
But is that the meaning of the poem, or only the intention of the author? (Even stipulating that there's an author, and I think Holbo makes a reasonable case that there isn't.) Is there any way in which the poem, absent its context, actually conveys that meaning? |
So that the meaning of John Holbo's poem is "look, I can write a silly but interesting poem disproving the notion of authorial intention..."? :-)