© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  At last, a worthy rival! (Or assimilee.)
  Main  
Travel  »

art

Satellize those microsystems, baby

12 o'clock, July 19, 2005

When [literary theory] doesn’t work, well, that’s when it looks more like a bunch of people dressing up banal or insane propositions in ornate and/or ungainly and/or neologistic language. That’s when you get people like Baudrillard saying, “by the orbital establishment of a system of control like peaceful coexistence, all terrestrial microsystems are satellized and lose their autonomy,” at which point you should decide to move away from the guy who’s clearly been in the coffee shop too long and has been slipping absinthe into his espresso since noon.

Michael Bérubé

Comments

I feel that way every time you and some of the other folks start going on about literary theory, but I thought it meant I'm stupid, not that you're all drunk on absinthe.

Now I know the truth!

—— JeremyT, 12:47 PM, Tuesday, July 19, 2005

I certainly won't deny having been in the coffee shop too long.

—— David Moles, 12:51 PM, Tuesday, July 19, 2005

No, no! Insane propositions expressed in ornate and gaudy language is the BEST part of French literary criticism! That's where all its giddy madness and delightful heady bizarre kookiness is.

If you try to read Derrida and Foucault and Kristeva as if they were prim, logical, Anglo-American philosophers, you'll only make yourself frustrated and miserable. Whereas if you read them as kin to Daffy Duck, e.e. cummings, and Antonin Artaud, you'll have a great deal of fun, and afterwards you feel larger, even though you can't quite explain what it was they were talking about...

Or that's been my experience, anyhow.

—— Benjamin Rosenbaum, 9:08 AM, Wednesday, July 20, 2005