© 2003-2006 David Moles
Chrononautic Log |
|
Main |
|
Alien Space Bats4 o'clock, June 14, 2005Okay, this weekend I’m writing an irrational history featuring Alien Space Bats. Poor writing is often criticized for its lack of plausibility. These attacks are usually phrased in terms of the need for “Alien Space Bats” or ASBs as the motive force behind the change. For example, “Well, Alien Space Bats could land the German army in Wales.” The use of the term Alien Space Bats has been expanded to include handwaving difficulties in order to get to an interesting discussion. (Wikipedia, soc.history.what-if.)
|
Comments |
|
How did they manage to capture the ASB in the photograph? I was led to believe that when faced with capture they regurgitated their inner organs, causing death. |
|
Jed, this is why I've been very good about keeping my hands off Wikipedia. (Okay, I've added a link here and there. But I can stop any time!) Dave, I'm sure it's all part of the bats' master plan. |
|
The ASB in the photo is actually in the process of regurgitating its internal organs. This was the only time it was ever captured on film. |
|
The dissertation-writing process contains about a billion small moments where I need to quickly fact-check something, like someone's date of birth or the original publication date of something. And sometimes I stop by Wikipedia just to see if they have what I'm looking for. About half of the time, they have a stub article, and I sit there thinking "ooh, I could write this article up, and then they'd have an article on this guy!" That lasts for about fifteen seconds, until I get to the second half of the thought, which is "...or I could get back to actually writing my dissertation." (The other half of the time, there's nothing there at all. I keep going back to Wikipedia for these fact-checkings even though they've never once yielded anything useful.) |
|
One of these days I#8217;m going to have to post my Master's thesis, wholesale. They#8217;ve got articles on Clive and Hastings; why not Benfield? (A: ’Cause nobody cares about Benfield.) |
|
I would just like to note that Ken Macleod's new novel contains quite literal alien space bats. Yesterday we were in a universe that included us and lots of cool stuff: stars, galaxies, plasmas, cometary bodies, planets, and cows and giraffes and AIs and blue-green algae and lichen and micro-organisms. Today we are in a universe that contains us and lots of cool stuff and alien space bats. -- from the biolog of Atomic Discourse Gale, age 15 (or thereabouts)You should read this book. Heck, everyone should read this book, because it's great. |
|
Well, it's been clear for a long time that Ken is (or has been) a serious Usenet reader, so I can't say I'm surprised. :) |
|
Hello.My name is DAN and i am a student in medicine veterinary in |
While I love the idea of Alien Space Bats, I'm now faced with a moral quandary:
That Wikipedia article could use some serious editing. Since it's Wikipedia, it would be technically easy for me to go in and do an editing pass. This would be satisfying in various ways. However, I'm way behind on all sorts of important things that I ought to be doing, and a thorough edit would require some research. (For example, I would feel obliged to find out whether the newsgroup misuses the phrase "plausible deniability" in the same way the article does, before correcting it in the article.)
Ah, well. Perhaps I'll just post an "ironic" note to the newsgroup mentioning the alternate history in which I went and cleaned up the writing in that Wikipedia article.