© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  Commendations and recommendations
  Main  
Damn, our authors are good  »

art

A note to writers

1 o'clock, February 1, 2005

This rant on undergraduate papers has much more application to fiction than it has any right to.

(Courtesy of Making Light. And no, this isn’t a comment on the quality of submissions to Twenty Epics — we haven’t opened any of those yet. It might be a comment on the quality of submissions to All-Star Zeppelin Adventure Stories, but, if you submitted to us and you’re reading this, not to yours, naturally. :))

Comments

You're just letting the subs pile up? How come?

Delayed due to the illness, or have you already lost the thrill of slushdiving?

—— Jon Hansen, 5:30 PM, Tuesday, February 1, 2005

Couple of reasons. Since Susan and I are collaborating at long distance, reading the MSS as they come in would involve a lot of photocopying and extra mail costs, whereas if we wait till the end of the submission period I can just take a few days off, fill the trunk up with envelopes and drive down to California. Plus, it’s just easier to spend a couple of days going through the whole stack than to spend a few hours on it every week.

But in general, as an editor, I think it’ll be better to wait till all the stories are in and then judge them on an equal footing. And as a writer, I want to discourage rejectomancy — particularly of the “I haven’t heard anything, but Bob’s already got a rejection notice — they must like my story!” variety.

It’d be different if I was running a magazine — then it’d be rolling acceptances and rejections, and worry about fitting the acceptances into the publication schedule later.

—— David Moles, 11:20 AM, Wednesday, February 2, 2005