© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  Earth to Assocated Press
  Main  
Shibboleth (updated)  »

art

My mistake, or, Iron Council mini-review

12 o'clock, August 15, 2004

Guess I’m not going to be the last person in the English-speaking world to read Iron Council after all.

I’ve still got the UK version on order, ’cause that’s the kind of sick fetishist that I am, but I broke down and bought the US edition Friday afternoon, since I’d decided Thursday I was going on a 36-hour writing retreat and knew I wasn’t going to be able to get away with no reading that whole time.

As you’d expect, I blew through it in about four sittings. (And yes, I did get a good bit of writing done, too, so shut your mouth.) Council didn’t have the urgency of The Scar, but it was an easier read than either Scar or Perdido — the writing in Council is probably better, line by line. Still, Mieville’s at his most interesting when he’s indulging his penchant for baroquely overwritten description, and too many of Council’s settings are too open and spare to let him really go over the top. And when he has a good opening for that sort of thing, like the Council’s two — two! — crossings of the cacotopic stain, he doesn’t always take it.

Not the Iron Council
Figure 1. Not the Iron Council.

I’m torn. On the one hand, I found the world of Perdido Street Station so fucked-up and depressing I’ve never been tempted to reread it, as impressive and memorable as it was. On the other hand, now that Iron Council (which is much more involved than The Scar with the things that made Perdido what it was, enough that I’m nearly tempted to reread the earlier book just to catch all the references I’d half forgotten) has offered that hopeless world some hope, it’s also drawn a lot of its poison.

I’d say The Scar is probably still my favorite. It’s a glorious mess, but Iron Council, though less messy, is also less glorious.

Comments

Aha! Did it offer the world any hope in the end, or merely the ephemeral illusion of hope? Does the symbol actually provide hope, or does it replace hope in a way that would prevent anything real from ahppening, by sucking up people's energies into the myth and the ream and away from their reality?

I think the jury is out, at the very least.

—— aphrael, 10:34 PM, Sunday, August 15, 2004

Just finished The Iron Council last night. I found the ending logical, appropriately foreshadowed, earned within the story, etc., etc., etc., but still INCREDIBLY FRUSTRATING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

—— Jay Lake, 5:58 AM, Monday, August 16, 2004

If it helps your peace of mind, you wouldn't have been the last person to read Iron Council. I won't read it until I read The Scar, and that's still sitting in my to read pile (yes, yes).

—— Jon, 8:50 AM, Monday, August 16, 2004

I think it’s real hope. Like someone says much earlier in the book, the symbolic meaning of the Iron Council is: “If we did it once, that means we can do it again.”

Also, if you contrast the New Crobuzon of the end of Iron Council with the New Crobuzon of Perdido Street Station, I think it’s a much less hopeless place overall. The feeling I got from Perdido was that the Mayor and Parliament were so entrenched, the militia so powerful, that nothing could ever change. “A boot stomping on a human face, forever.” Iron Council shows that change is possible.

—— David Moles, 9:47 AM, Monday, August 16, 2004