© 2003-2006 David Moles
Chrononautic Log |
|
Main |
|
Neocon Bingo9 o'clock, February 6, 2004About a decade ago, I invented a game with a colleague of mine who, like me, had once worked for Irving Kristol. We called it neoconservative bingo. The idea was that the clichés of neoconservative discourse would be arranged in various combinations on bingo cards: “The World's Only Superpower"; “The New Class”; “The China Threat”; “Decadent Europe”; “Against the UN”; “The Adversary Culture”; “The Global Democratic Revolution”; “Down With the Appeasers!”; “Be Firm Like Churchill.” The free space in the center of the bingo card would be “The Palestinian People Do Not Exist” (nowadays it would be “No Palestinian State” or “All Palestinians Are Terrorists”). As you read an essay or a book by a neoconservative, you would check off each slogan on the card in the order in which it appeared. —— Michael Lind, “A Tragedy of Errors”, The Nation, Feb. 2004 |
Comments |
|
The free space in the center of the bingo card would be “The Palestinian People Do Not Exist” (nowadays it would be “No Palestinian State” or “All Palestinians Are Terrorists”). How does he figure? Bush if the first President to advocate the formation of a Palestinian state as official U.S. policy. Does Lind not consider him or his administration "neocon"? Or does he simply not listen to the speeches of the President or those in his administration? You can say that you don't believe the President or trust his intentions, but it's ridiculous to call "No Palestinian State" a "cliche of neocon discourse". |
|
I'm guessing he figures by reading the Frum/Perle book that he's reviewing, or by reading David Brooks in the Weekly Standard, or by reading Douglas Feith. I don't know for sure, because I'm not familiar with his sources, but that's what the rest of the article would seem to imply. (Bush himself is barely mentioned, by the way.) It's also possible that Lind puts Bush's talk about a Palestinian state on the same level as his talk about a balanced budget. |
|
See also Jon Carroll's second column about buzzword bingo—Tom Davis of SGI invented the game around the time I was working there, but it was apparently invented independently in many other places and times. I emailed Scott Adams about it, which led to it being mentioned in Dilbert, but Adams always said he only included stuff that came from multiple sources, so someone else must've sent it to him too. |
|
Oops, and I forgot to say: I also wrote a column about it, discussing (among other things) our failed attempt at creating Post-Structuralist Buzzword Bingo. |
|
I still think Lit-Crit Bingo is a good idea. I’m not convinced that all those terms mean as much (or have meanings as agreed-upon) as their users think they do. And if they are for real, then the Theory people ought to take their physics envy to its logical extreme and put out a five-kilogram lower division Lit 1 textbook that actually explains all of them. The fact that they haven’t leads me to think that to them, alienating outsiders isn’t so much a possible cost of the system as a perceived benefit. |
|
Someone has taken this idea and run with it, even creating randomly-generated online bingo cards to go along with the game. |
|
Sweet! I love the pictures. |
Sounds like 'Bullshit Bingo',
Where current Business Buzzwords are arrayed.
- ROI, TCO, Time to market, go to market,
Some oldie but goodies:
- germane (popular in the 80's)
- 'user friendly' (popular in the *early* 80's)
- 'Internet speed'
...