Dept. of ‘This Is What I’m Saying’
10 o'clock, November 26, 2003
Remember the good old days, when you and your transhumanist
mates could amicably disagree on such pressing topics as the
name of your crypto-currency, the ocean your data haven
nano-atoll would float on, and whether or not you’d let your
other post-singularity instantiations join a hive-mind?
These days, that precious techno-consensus has shattered.
Brother against brother, Stross against Raymond; people
don’t even agree which Political Compass quiz to take any
more. We’re still trying to map out this new reality (so
much more tedious than the new realities we thought we'd
have by now). But an announcement this week seemed to peg
out the scale a little for us: the techno-libertarian Cato
Institute arguing with techno-socialist Bill Thompson over
whether Google should be a public utility. As diverse a
viewpoint as you could muster, and just as realistic a
discussion as those “what colour will you dye your solar
system” chats we had all those years ago.
——NTK, 11/21/03
As a science fiction writer, I have to say I’m mighty relieved to see the Wired magazine egoistic extropian consensus future breaking down. All that eschatological rigor was really harshing my mellow.
(Courtesy of Bruce Sterling again.)
One thing about extropian futurism: it gets superseded by reality faster than old-fashioned futurism.
It took thirty or forty years for people to start saying "Hey, where's my videophones, and flying cars, and robot servants?" when they noticed that the future had arrived and it wasn't the one they signed up for back in the fifties. Whereas it'll only take five or ten years for people to start saying "Hey, where's my singularity?"
Extropianism: it's more efficient.