© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  Hulk
  Main  
Inventor guys who are shy about gals  »

life

Seven Days Later

12 o'clock, July 8, 2003

Just got back from a weekend jaunt down to San Francisco (sorry, Mom!), where I worked on my swing, got too much sun, drank too much, listened to too much 80s music, and played too much “Battlefield 1942”. Good trip. (Even if Bob Mould played too much of his new stuff, and ACWLP turned out not to carry Locus and Green Apple didn’t yet have the July issue, which apparently has favorable mentions of “Theo’s Girl” and “Fetch”.) Wish I could quit my job and just hang out in Brandon’s basement.

In between all that other stuff, we went to see 28 Days Later. Everything John Shirley says about it is true. Stylish, well paced, well written, well acted, and just at my tolerance for being freaked out. (I slept okay, but two days later I was still checking the colors of people’s eyes and measuring up the distance in case I had to take them down.) The best thing about 28 Days is that it’s honest: there are twists, but they’re all genuine; no cheap gut shots, just a scary premise scarily presented. Serious zombie movie fans probably won’t like it because it’s not funny enough and doesn’t follow the formula; but that’s okay; serious kung-fu fans didn’t like Crouching Tiger, either. As far as the rest of us are concerned, I recommend it highly.

Comments

I still can't tell (from reviews) whether it's a horror movie or a serious science-fiction drama, or some of both. What do you think? I generally avoid horror movies, and I have no interest in zombie movies, but various people have indicated that it doesn't bear any resemblance to zombie movies (and that the "reinventing the zombie movie" thing was just a marketing slogan with no bearing on the movie). Thoughts?

(I more or less liked (but didn't love) The Quiet Earth, fwiw, if that helps calibrate.)

—— Jed, 2:02 PM, Tuesday, July 8, 2003

I’d say it’s not a horror movie, in something like the same sense that “What I Didn’t See” is SF. :)

I’m not into horror either. It reads well as post-apocalyptic science fiction.

—— David Moles, 2:08 PM, Tuesday, July 8, 2003

I've been meaning to post about this; I went to see it Friday night. Jared wouldn't go - he went to see Charlie's Angels instead - so I think I got the better deal.

—— aphrael, 5:03 PM, Tuesday, July 8, 2003