© 2003-2006 David Moles

Chrononautic Log

«  Well, fuck.
  Main  
You're just making excuses, Clay  »

art

“Oh, good; you're almost done”

12 o'clock, February 5, 2003

I managed to get in to William Gibson's reading at Elliott Bay last night. Got my Spanish-language copy of Neuromante signed, along with an English-language copy for Lara — and also a copy of the new book, Pattern Recognition, which I felt vaguely obligated to buy. I haven't really started it yet; the section he read, where protagonist Cayce Pollard meets a Russian kid named Voychek who collects Timex / Sinclair ZX81s, was damned funny, but — I'm not sure I go to William Gibson for funny, you know? We'll see.

Anyway, during the question-and-answer period, among other things (like sorting out someone's boy/girl fight over whether Case from Neuromancer, not to be confused with Cayce from Pattern Recognition, is a boy or a girl) he said that with every one of his novels, he gets to a point, usually when he's quite close to the end, where he becomes convinced not only that the book is bad, but that it's the worst book ever written.

He stumbles up from the basement.

His wife says: What's wrong?

It's the worst book ever written, he says.

Oh, good, she says. You're almost done.

Mr. Gibson has a great and wonderful variety of writerly tricks under his sleeve, but this is the one I need to learn: Realizing, when you're almost done, that what you're working on is the worst book ever written.

Not when you're only a third of the way through.

Comments

Gibson had a reading last night?! No one told me. Dammit.

—— Scott Janssens, 1:27 PM, Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Okay, I'm convinced. The only difference between writers who finish their books and writers who don't finish their books is that writers who finish their books actually finish their books.

—— Greg van Eekhout, 2:34 PM, Wednesday, February 5, 2003

That has got to be the best description of the creative process I've ever seen. Only I'm feeling that way by the end of the short story.

Novel? Feh.

—— Jon, 4:03 PM, Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Greg — Good observation. It is nice to know that the Greats have the same problems us mortals do.

Scott — I happened to notice on his blog that he was going to be reading down here, and then checked Locus' author appearances page.

—— David Moles, 4:12 PM, Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Jon — I feel the same way about short stories; I just have lower expectations for them.

—— David Moles, 9:37 AM, Thursday, February 6, 2003

Did he happen to mention, by the by, if he lets the first draft sit unmolested for a while after he finishes it? Or does this Worst Book Of All Time feeling persist through the editing process? I'm just wondering how long it takes for his objectivity to recover.

Or maybe he didn't say, in which case I withdraw the question.

—— Jon, 12:22 PM, Thursday, February 6, 2003

Yeah, he did say something about having to come back to the manuscript after a while away from it, to get some perspective.

He also said — paraphrasing — that keeping a blog seems to take up the space in his head that he uses for fiction writing, so once he starts working on his next novel, he'll probably drop the blog. (And that whatever work goes into his blog entries is mostly in the editing.)

—— David Moles, 5:22 PM, Thursday, February 6, 2003